[Advaita-l] [advaitin] 'Avidya' is not 'only' Adhyasa; it's more than that

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Namaste Chandramouli ji.


> Reg  // Because adhyasta entity by definition have a cause //,
>
> This rule is applicable only for a sAdi entity. Not for an anAdi entity.
> That is the definition of anAdi. Insisting on a cause for anAdi is invalid
> by definition.
>

1. Is ghaTa-prAk-abhAva anAdi?
2. Is ghaTa-prAk-abhAva adhyasta?
3. Does ghaTa-prAk-abhAva have avidyA as the cause?
4. Is avidyA avidyA-kalpita?

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.