[Advaita-l] No Parinama in Brahman says Shankara Bhagavatpada

[Praveen R. Bhat]

Sorry missed the group in reply!


>
>
> On Thu 27 Jun, 2019, 13:21 H S Chandramouli, <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Namste Praveen Ji,
>>
>> A quick initial response, covering  just one fundamental point (in my
>> view).
>>
>> Reg  << True, but this was already covered with tucCha and mithyA.
>> However, he is not convinced as to how something non-existent can derive
>> from brahman as it is non-existent >>,
>>
>>  Well. Certainly I expected this question, but from Sudhanshu Ji !!
>>
> That's why I said he, as I don't have this question. The only possibility
> is anirvachanIyayA mAyayA sarvasya sambhavAt, where mAyA is better
> interpreted as magic. To me, it is a very satisfying answer though others
> may see it as a non-answer.
>
> Some may have to have samAdhyanubhava to resolve such questions.
>
> In fact , in my view, that is the crux of the problem  being discussed.
>> Well, the answer is,  it is an axiom in logic that  only an “ Existing “
>> entity  can have any activity like appearence.  And not a nonexisting
>> entity.  It is a Declaration, to be accepted as  truth, without any
>> questions. It is based on this, and other axioms as well,   as foundation
>> that the logical structure is built. This position, that it is an axiom and
>> not an established truth in logic,  is what is completely overlooked in
>> the  objection raised above.
>>
>
> Thanks, I agree with you. In fact, the resultant of tarka itself cannot be
> idamittham due to the axioms being questionable.
>
>>