[Advaita-l] asat & asatya / sat & satya

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Bhaskar ji,

1. Avidya is jnana-abhAva as per Swamiji.

2. He has quoted Chitsukhacharya and Anubhuti swarup acharya at one place.
Though I am sure that he did not agree with them at other places.

3. I have not come across such interpretation as of his in any of the
ancient advaita Vedanta tradition.

Regards.
Sudhanshu.

On Thu 22 Aug, 2019, 13:37 Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification.  Frankly speaking,  this is the first time
> in my advaita journey I am hearing all these things.  Did anyone in ancient
> Advaita tradition follow this method of interpretation to make the jagat
> safe from asat/mithya??  Does the Swamiji quote any vyAkhyAnakAra with
> regard to this if not directly from shankara bhAshya??  And now the big
> question is where the avidyA fits in this scenario or should we assume all
> these different interpretations pertain only to jagat and brahman as per
> swamiji??  If the avidyA is mithyA/asat then avidyA in its mUla rUpa abhAva
> only according to swamiji.  If the avidyA is not asat but sat (the existing
> one) then it is there in some form.  Or if the avidyA is neither sat nor
> asat then it is anirvachaneeya or abhAva vilakshaNaM.  What is swamiji’s
> take on this issue.  Pls. clarify.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
> Yes. Sorry. Asat is neither satya nor asatya.
>
>
>
> On Thu 22 Aug, 2019, 13:22 Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
>
> Asatya is not sat and hence neither satya nor asatya
>
>
>
> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> The first asatya in the above statement should have been ‘asat’ is it
> not??  Or am I getting confuses??
>
>
>
> Rgds
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
>