[Advaita-l] Is Badarayana same as Vyasa?

[D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ]

The other two namely Vakya (mimamsa) Pramana (nyaya) depend upon correct
meanings for words.

regards,
Sarma.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:22 PM, D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ <
dvnsarma at gmail.com> wrote:

> Padavaakya pramaanatah.
>
> Therefore the Purvacharyas commented not according to tradition but using
> grammer and logic.
>
> Now let us take the first one pada or grammer. Meanings of words are
> interpreted according to grammatical rules. Which grammer? There were many
> grammers .
> Majority of people opted for PAnini's grammer because of its brevity and
> maximum coverage. It is not perfect. There are many usages in sanskrit that
> are not covered by
> Panini. Example is Magha's Sisupalavadham which contains many apaniniya
> prayogas which were there in usage. Similarly Madhaviya Dhatuvritti seems
> to endorse many apaniniya usages.
> Bhasha pravahini. It is never static. In light of the above what is the
> praamaanya of a commentary which is based on one grammer.. Munitraya
> pramanya is a praudhavada. No sensible man accepts it..
> I hope by now you understand my point that tradiition not a perfect
> interpreter.
>