[Advaita-l] Ramana Maharshi - Advaitin or Neo Advaitin?
Praveen R. Bhat
bhatpraveen at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 07:27:49 CDT 2016
I wouldn't have replied to this since we kind of closed the discussion
earlier on, but for my name being mentioned. I just reply to a little more
than that line alone. :)
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Kripa Shankar <kripa.shankar.0294 at gmail.com
> Some great points of grave import presented by SrimaLalitalalitah.
True, unlike the points made without basis. Wiki quotes don't count.
> Praveen, like many others are trying to defend Ramana
> as if it's an assault on Ramana s character, which clearly is not(it's
> also irrelevant) .
Not true. Your usage of words such as what he ate, etc, could be construed
as an assault, especially since that was not only irrelevant, it was also
> But I am baffled to see that when Shruti pramana is neglected, in other
> words when the Shruti is under assault, no one takes offence!
I hope you meant somewhere else because shruti-pramANa is very well
defended, at least on this list. Please don't mix this up when you name me,
lest it be misunderstood. :)
Just wanted to add one more point. I was watching a video of Bharati
> teertha swami delivering a lecture in Tamil. There he categorically stated
> that Sringeri Mutt never acknowledges anyone outside of the Mutt
but a pramada (an exception) to this rule was when one of the great swamis
> (can't recall the name sorry) acknowledged Sadashiva Brahmendra. It is on
Not a proving fact of anything, as we have seen Kanchi Paramacharya
acknowledging something didn't help. Nonetheless, a link might interest
others, since I don't know Tamil.
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
[Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list