[Advaita-l] dva suparNA
Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at braincells.com
Fri Nov 13 01:41:23 CST 2015
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l wrote:
> Because the second bird does not have kartritva/bhoktritva and from
> AchArya's use of chaitanyamAtram in describing Brahma svabhAva, it's
> probably reasonable to conclude he is referring to nirguNa brahman?
Well I was going to post a longer reply but Shri Chandramouli has beaten
my to it. I just want to concur that the second bird is not nirguNa
brahman in the munDakopaniShad context because both birds are in the
"samAna vR^ikSha" i.e. the sharIra.
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list