[Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 30 12:29:36 CDT 2013
I think Sama Vidhana Brahmana clearly says that Badarayana Vyasa is different from Vedavyasa. I think Adi Sankara did not equate Vedavyasa with Badarayana Vyasa. The confusion could have occurred later on. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.
From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
Actually the Brahmasuutras are by
Badarayana - the second chapter dismisses the Buddhist doctrines. Traditionally
our achaaryas have equated Badarayana with Veda Vyaasa. Apparently there were
several suutras before Badarayana suutras but many got last after Badarayana
suutras became prominent.I donot think authorship is different for the first four suutras compared to that of the rest of the suutras. Hari Om!
> From: Swami Sarvabhutananda <swami.sarvabhutananda at gmail.com>
>To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
>BrahmasUtrA (ie) chatussUtri is from VEDA VYASA.
>It is in the form of sUtrAs and the bhAshyA is from ShankarA.
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list