[Advaita-l] Questions on mayavada
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 10 10:38:53 CST 2010
It is like the Vedantist today saying that Sankhya is wrong or Yoga is wrong, though these are not wrong and are valid within their scope and they do not go to the Vedantic level. So also Lord Buddha did not touch Vedanta as he was forbidden to teach it , yet out of sympathy for his advanced disciples he spoke about the concept of Shunyata. Madam Blavatsky explained that. Adi Sankaracharya and Gaudapada knew the truth. However most people today read a bit about Lord Buddha and a bit about Vedanta and see the criticism of what Dignaga and Dharmakirti said as the direct criticism of Lord Buddha. The people, who criticise Lord Buddha do not know that Lord Buddha told the highest truth without the argumentation of the Buddhist logicians. Some Brahmin priests could have been up against Lord Buddha as Lord Buddha was against excess ritualism in the name of the Vedas and they propagated that Lord Buddha was against the Veda. It does not
get registered in thir grey matter that Lord Buddha said that he did not invent anything and that he only told what the ancient seers told.
Now it is quite possible that you will surf the Internet and show your scholarship that you always knew all about what Blavatsky said and that even your knowledge on Blavatsky is more than what I know.
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, srikanta <srikanta at nie.ac.in> wrote:
From: srikanta <srikanta at nie.ac.in>
Subject: [Advaita-l] Questions on mayavada
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 2:03 AM
You said as follows:
<< .It is too childish to say that niether Gaudapada nor Shankara criticised
Do you think your giving an assertion without substantiang it is unchildish?
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
Dear Sunil Bhattacharyaji,
I have given the gist of Gaudapada's arguments which says that vedanta is
not Buddhism.Shankara's commentary follows that.If you say that neither
Gaudapada or Shankara criticised Buddha,what else can I say.To understand
that,you have to study Mandukya Upanishad and the Gaudapada karikas.If the
arguments there must be followed.If you simply repeat what I said,what
else is it?We are not indulging in vithandavada.
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list