[Advaita-l] The nature of spiritual realisation
vaidix at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 7 09:38:46 CDT 2003
That was a good one from Sri Sankara.
Let us note that, while Sankara declared that consciousness is different
from body, this reply seems to be tailor made for the question about the
body. Acharya did not address the question whether the body really exists in
the first place, what elements it is made of etc. If these questions are
asked Acharya has other arguments waiting for the opponent.
IMO, for the purpose of this discussion self means individual atma, which
perceives the body and organs. Some medical experiments done on people who
lost organs confirm that the perception of lost organ is still not lost by
the person. Vaidic brahmana texts also declare that organs like eyes, ears,
hands etc are made of interactions of devas, and these interactions are the
real cause of the body and organs, not any physical materials. Even the
elements like fire, etc are ultimately caused by the devas at cosmic level,
so self is every thing. Sorry for rushing the arguments.
By self if we mean supreme self, we need to fine tune the argument that this
supreme self does not really get involved in activities like perception etc,
but it is the devas like indra who really perceive, while self/brahman is
merely the background.
Please suggest changes if I am wrong.
Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month
(depending on the local service providers in your area).
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list