[Advaita-l] Is Badarayana same as Vyasa?

D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ dvnsarma at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 10:11:28 EDT 2018


आयन शब्दः प्रायशः अपत्यार्थे विनियुक्तं भवति। यदि बादरायणः बादरेरपत्यं स
कथं पराशररस्यापत्यं भवति।

regards,
Sarma.

2018-07-22 19:31 GMT+05:30 D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ <dvnsarma at gmail.com>:

> किं, *बादरायणसंबन्धः* व्यसबादरायणयोः संबन्धस्य बलहीनत्वं सूचयति वा।
>
> regards,
> Sarma.
>
> 2018-07-22 12:00 GMT+05:30 V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>:
>
>> The Bharata Savitri is a part of the Harivamsha which itself is an
>> appendix
>> of the Mahabharata.  In this text there is are a few verses that bring out
>> the Vyasa-Badarayana non-difference identity:
>>
>> http://www.dvaipayana.net/harivamsa/bharatasavitri-v2_utf.html
>>
>>
>> व्यासं वसिष्ठनप्तारं शक्तेः पौत्रमकल्मषम् |
>> पराशरात्मजं वन्दे शुकतातं तपोनिधिम् || १ ||
>>
>> व्यासाय विष्णुरूपाय व्यासरूपाय विष्णवे |
>>
>> नमो वै ब्रह्मनिधये वासिष्ठाय नमोनमः || २ ||
>>
>> अचतुर्वदनो ब्रह्मा द्विबाहुरपरो हरिः |
>> अफाललोचनः शंभुर्भगवान् बादरायणः || ३ ||
>>
>> मुनिं स्निग्धांबुजाभासं वेदव्यासमकल्मषम् |
>> वेदव्यासं सरस्वत्यावासं व्यासं नमाम्यहम् || ४ ||
>>
>> While the 1, 2 and 4 verses have the name vyasa, the 3 has a description
>> of
>> Vyasa as a combination of the Trimurtis and names it Badarayana. The other
>> name of Vyasa, as the son of Parashara, is also indicated in the first
>> verse.
>>
>> regards
>> subbu
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list