[Advaita-l] Sri Haridasa Bhat's Brilliant Presentation of Sat Khyaati Vaada
vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 9 12:12:09 EST 2017
If you don't understand why I am using Sri Haridas Bhat's Khandana of
Sat Khyaati Vaada kindly do not make meaningless statements. We have
to accept the Khandana because Advaitis also say Silver in shell is
not Sat. Therefore partly we agree with Dvaitis on this point. Sat
Khyati Khandana is Ishta for us also. But at the same time we say
Silver in shell is not Asat also. On this point we can argue with
Dvaitis. I will write one more piece on how to handle Dvaitis.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l
<advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> Hare Krishna
> The big difference is we say Anirvachaneeya rajata is not Sat. It is not real. We don't agree Mother is in Wife at Vyavahara level. Therefore no Dosha in Patni Gamana.
> You must understand Advaitis have accepted Vyavaharika Satya. In this there is Bheda. We are only saying No Bheda in Paramarthika. At that stage there is no bank account and no money also.
>> Please go with these explanations to Sri HaridAsa Bhatta to prove that all is fair in vyAvahArika satya and in pAramArtika there is no difference between wife and mother, see whether he agrees with your explanation. Please remember, for the dvaitins we, the advaitins are more weaker pUrvapaxins (though influential ) with these comfortable distinctions (between vyAvahArika and pAramArthika) than the v.advaitins :-) Since you are quoting his 'brilliant' presentation as a refutation to khyAti vAda, it is better to take his stand on these explanations as well I reckon.
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list