[Advaita-l] Defintion of anubhava
Praveen R. Bhat
bhatpraveen at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 06:44:12 EDT 2017
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com> wrote:
> However, I am afraid, this leads to a similar आरोप of dualists as we saw
> in the thread following Vadiraja's work.
> Not sure, what are you referring to here?
I was thinking of some discussion of brahman being different from asat
does not need the knowledge of its existence, etc. I'll let that be.
Thanks for the interesting details from Advaitasiddhi and commentaries.
Its nice to see Bhashyakara's unique Chandogya interpretation used to
refute objections on the definition of mithyAtva.
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list