[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Works of Sri Vidyashankara

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 2 15:51:06 CST 2017


Dear friends,

The Mahabharata as published by the GIta Press does contain the statement that the Bhagavad Gita as originally composed was of 745 verses and goes on the say it has 620 verses attributed to Lord Krishna. Mr. Kaul has not read the Mahabharata. well. He is used to telling numerous lies and he thinks that everybody lies.

Bhaskara wrote a bhashya without those missing verses, as whatever he found difficult to handle he left them out.   The refutation of that by Shankara (not Adi Shanaka) obviously got limited to that vulgate version. That is why also the Gita press incorporated the commonly available vulgate version. 

Those who do not want to read the original Bhagavad Gita of 745 verses, may very well forget about that. Lord Krishna advises towards the end of the Bhaagavad gita not to talk about the Bhagavad Gita to the unbelievers. 

Regards,
SKB


--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 1/2/17, A K Kaul jyotirved at gmail.com [advaitin] <advaitin at yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] Works of Sri Vidyashankara
 To: "advaitin at yahoogroups.com" <advaitin at yahoogroups.com>
 Cc: "Venkatraghavan S" <agnimile at gmail.com>, advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
 Date: Monday, January 2, 2017, 2:39 AM
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       Shri
 Sunil Bhattacharjyaji,Jai Shri
 Ram!In your
 response to Shri Venkataraghavan of "Advaita-l"
 lists (appended below), you have saidQuoteTthe
 Bhagavadgitabhashya does not have 745 verses, even
 though the Gita press
 edition of the Mahabharata clearly
 shows that the
 Bhagavad Gita had 745 verses.
 UnquoteThat is a lie of the worst kind since the
 Gita Press edition of the Mahabharata also contains the Gita
 of only 700 (not even 701) shlokas, not to speak of 745
 verses!.It has exactly the same number of shlokas as
 detailed by me in my mail of December 31, 2016, and I
 quoteQuoteFollowing  is
 the number of shlokas in each Adhyaya of the
 Gyaneshwari-Gita vis-v-vis the Gita of Gita Press as well as
 the commentary of Aadi Shankara:I=47;
 II=72; III=43; IV=42; V=29; VI=47; VII=30; VIII=28; IX=34;
 X=42; XI=55; XII=20; XIII=35 (as against 34 of Aadi
 Shankara/Gita Press Gita); XIV=27; XV=20; XVI=24; XVII=28;
 XVIII=78.The
 total of all these shlokas of Gyaneshwari--Marathi, comes to
 701 shlokas as against 700 shlokas.UnquoteThe Gita
 of the Gita Press Mahabharata does not have even the
 additional shloka of the thirteenth Adyaya of
 Gyaneshwari-Marathi edition!Why do
 you spin lies to prove your points which you can never
 prove!You have
 also yet to tell us as to how Prof. Narahari Achar has
 "used modern astronomy " to show that Aadi
 Shankara was born in 509 BCE.  How long do we have to wait
 for those clarifications?Jai Shri
 Ram!On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:22
 AM, Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
 [advaitin] <advaitin at yahoogroups.com>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       
 
  
 
  Dear Vidyashankarji,
 
  
 
  I think you have not known that my doubts about the
 
  authorship of the Bhagavadgitabhashya by Adi Shankara,
 arose
 
  only after I came to know about Prof. Karmarkar's
 analysis.
 
  It looks as if due to prejudice many have not cared to
 read
 
  the paper of Karmarkar. So there is no case of
 
  force-fitting, and it was only the open way of examining
 new
 
  information.
 
  
 
  Good that now I find that the general opinion is that
 Sri
 
  Vidyashankar had not written any text. But there must be
 
  some reason why both the Kudali Sringeri and the
 Sringeri
 
  mathas have the grand Vidyashankar temples in their
 
  premises, but similar honour to the other
 post-AdiShankara
 
  pontiffs are miising. 
 
  
 
  Regarding Nava Shankara or Abhinava Shankara, it was
 Shri
 
  Pathak who got the three page document on that according
 to
 
  which this Nava Shankara was born in 788 CE. Shri Pathak
 
  published a paper on that. It is interesting to see that
 the
 
  Sringeri matha also claimed the date of their first
 
  mathadhipati from that time. This probably gave an
 
  impression to some scholars like Udaivir Shastri that
 the
 
  Sringeri math was established by this Abhinava Shankara.
 
  Abhinava Shankara, for your kind information is one of
 the
 
  pontiffs of the Kanchi Kamakoti matha.
 
  
 
  As regards Shri Niranjan Saha's paper I wrote back to
 him in
 
  private as he asked for a review of his paper. I am yet
 to
 
  hear from Shri Saha.  
 
  
 
  I don't condemn the mathas other than the Sringeri
 matha,
 
  and I also look with an open mind at what others are
 saying,
 
  even if they differ from the opinion of the Sringeri,
 for
 
  which I have great respect. I wish I belonged to the
 inner
 
  circle of the Shringeri matha, so that I could have
 helped
 
  the matha to undo the wrongs the historians had done to
 that
 
  matha. 
 
  
 
  Regards,
 
  Sunil KB
 
  
 
  ------------------------------ --------------
 
  On Sun, 1/1/17, Vidyasankar Sundaresan <svidyasankar at gmail.com>
 
  wrote:
 
  
 
   Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] Works of Sri
 
  Vidyashankara
 
   To: "Sunil Bhattacharjya" <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
 >
 
   Cc: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta"
 <advaita-l at lists.advaita-
 vedanta.org>,
 
  "Venkatraghavan S" <agnimile at gmail.com>
 
   Date: Sunday, January 1, 2017, 9:54 AM
 
   
 
   Dear
 
   Sunilji,
 
   In general, if you want to answer questions of
 
   textual and historical import, you have to have a more
 
  solid
 
   basis first to ask questions, not just some doubts and
 
   hunches. Secondly, you should try not to force fit data
 to
 
   preconceived conclusions.
 
   It looks like you are determined, somehow or
 
   the other, to come up with a different author for the
 
   gItAbhAshya than Adi Sankara. So, in your estimation,
 it
 
   must be anybody else, either an entirely mythical and
 
   non-historical abhinava Sankara or the historical
 
   vidyASankara who has traditionally not been known to
 have
 
   written any texts at all. 
 
   Our list member, Niranjan Saha, has already
 
   shared with you, by private email, a very recent paper
 
   surveying the academic scholarly output regarding the
 
   authorship of the gItAbhAshya. Please read it with some
 
   care.
 
   I don't understand why you would throw out
 
   both the tradition that says that this bhAshya is by
 Adi
 
   Sankara and also the bulk of the modern scholarship
 that
 
   concludes that this traditional attribution is right.
 
   Instead, you are basing your argument upon a solitary
 
  paper
 
   that is now quite outdated, along with a highly
 
  speculative
 
   attempt at reconstructing history. The entire exercise
 is
 
   very strange indeed!
 
   Best regards,
 
   
 
   Vidyasankar
 
   On Jan 1, 2017 2:29 AM,
 
   "Sunil Bhattacharjya via Advaita-l" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-
 vedanta.org>
 
   wrote:
 
   Namaste
 
   Venkataraghavanji,
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Thank you for your mail. may I request you kindly to
 send
 
  me
 
   a photocopy of  T.K. Gopalaswamy Aiyengar's
 paper
 
   titled "BhAskara on the
 
   
 
   Gita" presented at the GIta SamIkshA conference held
 in
 
   Tirupati on March, 1970.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Would you think that Abhinava Shankara, another very
 
  famous
 
   avatara of Adi Shankaracharya, could have written the
 
   Bhagavadgita bhashya, if and when all evidences confirm
 
   that  a fresh bhashya on the Bhagavadhita was needed
 to
 
  be
 
   written by Sri Vidyashankara to refute  Sri
 
   Ramabujacharya's Bhagavadgitabjashya, as one
 advaitic 
 
   bhashya was already therein Sri ramanujacharya's
 time.
 
   This will be satisfy the objection that language style
 of
 
   the Bhagavadgitabhshya was different for Adi
 Shankara's
 
   other bhashyas.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Tthe Bhagavadgitabhashya does not have 745 verses, even
 
   though the Gita press edition of the Mahabharata
 clearly
 
   shows that the Bhagavad Gita had 745 verses. One
 
  possibility
 
   is that Sri Vidyashankara had just to refute only the
 
   version with 700 verses on which Sri Ramanujacharya
 wrote
 
   his bhashya.  But if any one before Sri Ramanujacharya
 
   wrote the advaitic bhashya on the Bhagavadgita, then
 the
 
   question as to why the 45 verses were omitted still
 
   stands,
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Regards,
 
   
 
   Sunil KB
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   ------------------------------ --------------
 
   
 
   On Sat, 12/31/16, Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l
 <advaita-l at lists.advaita-
 
   vedanta.org> wrote:
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] Works of Sri
 
   Vidyashankara
 
   
 
    To: "A discussion group for Advaita
 Vedanta"
 
   <advaita-l at lists.advaita-
 
   vedanta.org>
 
   
 
    Date: Saturday, December 31, 2016, 10:06 AM
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Namaste,
 
   
 
    One thing we can use to determine objectively
 
   
 
    if Shankara bhagavatpAda
 
   
 
    wrote the gIta
 
   
 
    bhAshya, or if it was a later advaitin in his
 
   tradition,
 
   
 
    is
 
   
 
    to see if there is any evidence from
 
   
 
    other commentators that are
 
   
 
    chronologically
 
   
 
    proximate to him.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    It is
 
   
 
    widely accepted that BhAskara, a bhedAbhedavadin, who
 
   is
 
   
 
    said to have
 
   
 
    lived around c. 800 AD
 
   
 
    ("BhAskara the VedAntin", Daniel Ingalls),
 is
 
   a
 
   
 
    close contemporary of Shankaracharya. BhAskara
 
   
 
    quotes Shankara's brahma
 
   
 
    sUtra bhAshya
 
   
 
    quite extensively in his own bhAshya to this
 prasthAna.
 
   
 
    BhAskara, in turn, is quoted by VAcaspati
 
   
 
    Mishra in BhAmati. Therefore, he
 
   
 
    must have
 
   
 
    lived between Shankara's and VAcaspati's
 
   
 
    lifetimes.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Now turning to
 
   
 
    the question if there are any references to
 
   Shankara's
 
   
 
    gIta
 
   
 
    bhAshya in any of BhAskara's works.
 
   
 
    Unfortunately, not too many surviving
 
   
 
    works
 
   
 
    of BhAskara are available to us. Thankfully, there
 are
 
   some
 
   
 
    fragments
 
   
 
    available from his gIta bhAshya (9
 
   
 
    chapters of his gIta bhAshya are
 
   
 
    published
 
   
 
    by the Benares Sanskrit University, edited by Dr.
 
   
 
    Subhadropadhyaya, 1964).
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    In the few fragments of the BhAskara gIta
 
   
 
    bhAshya available today, there is
 
   
 
    one
 
   
 
    interesting comment he makes when commenting on sloka
 
   
 
    2.21:
 
   
 
    वेदाविनाशिनं
 
   
 
    नित्यं य
 
   एनमजमव्ययम्
 
   
 
    ।
 
   
 
    कथं स पुरुषः
 
   
 
    पार्थ कं घातयति
 
   हन्ति
 
   
 
    कम् ॥ २१ ॥
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    These are Shankara's words in his
 
   
 
    commentary to the bhAshya:
 
   हेत्वर्थस्य
 
   
 
    च
 
   
 
    अविक्रियत्वस्य
 
   
 
    तुल्यत्वात् *विदुषः
 
   
 
    सर्वकर्मप्रतिषेध
 एव
 
   
 
    प्रकारणार्थः
 
   
 
    अभिप्रेतो भगवता*
 
   
 
    ।
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Turning to BhAskara, he
 
   
 
    quotes Shankara in the bhAshya to the same verse:
 
   
 
    अत्र क्लेशभीरव:
 
   
 
    केचित् स्वमतं
 
   
 
    भगवत्यारोप्य
 
   
 
    वर्णयन्ति *विदुष:
 
   
 
    सर्वकर्मप्रतिषेध
 
   
 
    एव
 
   
 
  
  प्रकरणार्थोSभिप्रेतो
 
   
 
    भगवता* इति.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    In commenting on this verse, BhAskara
 
   
 
    criticises Shankara's bhAshya by
 
   
 
    saying
 
   
 
    that Shankaracharya is simply attributing his own
 views
 
   onto
 
   
 
    Lord
 
   
 
    Krishna when he says "in this
 
   
 
    context, Krishna's view is that for the wise
 
   
 
    person total renunciation of karma is
 
   
 
    prescribed".
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Its quite
 
   
 
    clear here that BhAskara is quoting Shankara's
 gIta
 
   
 
    bhAshya
 
   
 
    verbatim. Given that BhAskara also
 
   
 
    quotes Shankara in his Brahma sUtra
 
   
 
    bhAshya,
 
   
 
    we can conclude that the Shankara that wrote the gIta
 
   
 
    bhAshya must
 
   
 
    have lived at the same time as
 
   
 
    the Shankara that wrote the brahma sUtra
 
   
 
    bhAshya. A reasonable simplification to make is
 
   
 
    that it is indeed the same
 
   
 
    person.
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    (The above references to
 
   
 
    BhAskara's bhAshya and his quotation of
 
   
 
    Shankara's
 
   
 
    bhAshya are from T.K.
 
   
 
    Gopalaswamy Aiyengar's paper titled
 "BhAskara
 
   on
 
   
 
    the
 
   
 
    Gita" presented at the GIta
 
   
 
    SamIkshA conference held in Tirupati on March
 
   
 
    1970. The proceedings of the conference have
 
   
 
    been published by Sri
 
   
 
    Venkateswara
 
   
 
    University, Tirupati. It is available in electronic
 
   form
 
   
 
    at
 
   
 
    archive.org)
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    Regards,
 
   
 
    Venkatraghavan
 
   
 
    _____________________________ _ _________________
 
   
 
    Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
 
   org/archives/advaita-l/
 
   
 
    http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.
 
   culture.religion.advaita
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    To unsubscribe or change your
 
   
 
    options:
 
   
 
    http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
 
   org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
    For assistance, contact:
 
   
 
    listmaster at advaita-vedanta.
 org
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   ______________________________ _________________
 
   
 
   Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
 
   org/archives/advaita-l/
 
   
 
   http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.
 
   culture.religion.advaita
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   To unsubscribe or change your options:
 
   
 
   http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
 
   org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   For assistance, contact:
 
   
 
   listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     __._,_.___
 
           
   
  
 
     
      
 
     
         
         Posted by: A K Kaul <jyotirved at gmail.com>     
   
      
      
 
     
                           Reply
 via web post
                       •
             
                Reply to sender            
           •
             
               Reply to group            
           •
             Start a New
 Topic
           •
                             Messages in this
 topic
                 (64)
                       
 
         
 
             
         
          
         
             
             
                 Have you tried the highest rated
 email app?
                 With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the
 highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting
 for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook,
 AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with
 1000GB of free cloud storage.
             
         
               
      
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
       
 
 
       Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta
 Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. (Members
 belong to vasudhaiva kutumbam)
 
 Advaitin Homepage at:  http://www.advaitin.net/
 
 To Post a message send an email to:
 advaitin at yahoogroups.com
 
 Messages Archived at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/advaitin/messages
 
 
 
       
 
 
     
   
 
  
 
 
 
 
     Visit Your Group
 
      
   
 
 
 
   
    • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
   
   
   
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
      
 
   .
 
 
    
 
 
  
 
 __,_._,___
 
 
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926 --
   #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp {
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px
 0;padding:0 10px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp hr {
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp #yiv3906727926hd {
 color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp #yiv3906727926ads {
 margin-bottom:10px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp .yiv3906727926ad {
 padding:0 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp .yiv3906727926ad p {
 margin:0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mkp .yiv3906727926ad a {
 color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor
 #yiv3906727926ygrp-lc {
 font-family:Arial;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor
 #yiv3906727926ygrp-lc #yiv3906727926hd {
 margin:10px
 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor
 #yiv3906727926ygrp-lc .yiv3906727926ad {
 margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926actions {
 font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity {
 background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity span {
 font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity span:first-child {
 text-transform:uppercase;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity span a {
 color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity span span {
 color:#ff7900;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926activity span
 .yiv3906727926underline {
 text-decoration:underline;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926attach {
 clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
 0;width:400px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926attach div a {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926attach img {
 border:none;padding-right:5px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926attach label {
 display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926attach label a {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 blockquote {
 margin:0 0 0 4px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926bold {
 font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926bold a {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 dd.yiv3906727926last p a {
 font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 dd.yiv3906727926last p span {
 margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 dd.yiv3906727926last p
 span.yiv3906727926yshortcuts {
 margin-right:0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926attach-table div div a {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926attach-table {
 width:400px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926file-title a, #yiv3906727926
 div.yiv3906727926file-title a:active, #yiv3906727926
 div.yiv3906727926file-title a:hover, #yiv3906727926
 div.yiv3906727926file-title a:visited {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926photo-title a,
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926photo-title a:active,
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926photo-title a:hover,
 #yiv3906727926 div.yiv3906727926photo-title a:visited {
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 div#yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg
 #yiv3906727926ygrp-msg p a span.yiv3906727926yshortcuts {
 font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926green {
 color:#628c2a;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926MsoNormal {
 margin:0 0 0 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 o {
 font-size:0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926photos div {
 float:left;width:72px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926photos div div {
 border:1px solid
 #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926photos div label {
 color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926reco-category {
 font-size:77%;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926reco-desc {
 font-size:77%;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 .yiv3906727926replbq {
 margin:4px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {
 margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg {
 font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean,
 sans-serif;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg table {
 font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg select,
 #yiv3906727926 input, #yiv3906727926 textarea {
 font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv3906727926
 code {
 font:115% monospace;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg * {
 line-height:1.22em;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3906727926logo {
 padding-bottom:10px;}
 
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-msg p a {
 font-family:Verdana;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-msg
 p#yiv3906727926attach-count span {
 color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-reco
 #yiv3906727926reco-head {
 color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-reco {
 margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor #yiv3906727926ov
 li a {
 font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor #yiv3906727926ov
 li {
 font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-sponsor #yiv3906727926ov
 ul {
 margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-text {
 font-family:Georgia;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-text p {
 margin:0 0 1em 0;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-text tt {
 font-size:120%;}
 
 #yiv3906727926 #yiv3906727926ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {
 border-right:none !important;
 }
 #yiv3906727926 
 


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list