[Advaita-l] Paul Hacker's erroneous view
Praveen R. Bhat
bhatpraveen at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 11:46:14 CDT 2016
Thanks for bringing in an important point which I was planning to make
yesterday, but didn't because I had not read through all that was being
discussed. This is amiss in people who lack the background of such kAvya
composition or tarka basis. Even in vyAkaraNa sUtras, what is prApta alone
can be a candidate for consideration, be it negation or not. No one would
think that Shankaracharya is Shiva due to his name being similar, bringing
in the necessity of consideration or negation.
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
[Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:07 PM, V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:03 PM, D Gayatri <dgayatrinov10 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The very comparison by Padmapada arises only because of the fact that
> > > believed that Shankara was Shiva avatara. Otherwise there is no reason
> > > make that comparison for the mere name being Shankara.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list