[Advaita-l] Ramana Maharshi - Advaitin or Neo Advaitin?
lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com
Sun Oct 2 08:24:09 CDT 2016
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com>
> Everyone is familiar with "I", and if they have a religious upbringing,
> they know Ishvara too. So it cannot be argued that the tattvas are
> completely unknown.
First of all, these are not those tattva-s which are said to be one by
The parichchhina-chaitanya is not tattva.
So, no knowing these two is not enough.
> For an uttamAdhikAri who is taught 'brahmaivAham asmi' as part of SandhyA
If he was taught, then you are in my camp, not other's.
BTW, just 'hearing' a sentence from someone somewhere can't be termed as
learning the same. More so when the meaning was never taught.
> no one can definitively say it is impossible to understand through vichAra
> the true meanings of I and Brahman for that aikya vAkya to have tAtparya.
What this vichAra is? I'll give you some time to ponder.
Think about the nature of vichAra. And, when you are sure that it is not a
prAmANa, then I'll look at rest of your post.
If I continue now, I'll have to propound many things.
Moreover, I don't want to continue by assuming any of your faults(wrong
ideas) granted. It increases complexity of my answers.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list