[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Wed May 25 01:01:31 CDT 2016
Any work that teaches Brahman Atman moksha etc is essentially bases on
Shruti only. With this as basis alone it delves on yukti etc.
On May 25, 2016 11:21 AM, "Praveen R. Bhat via Advaita-l" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> Namaste Chandramouliji,
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:28 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com>
> > Reg << Shruti-based logic, that is, based on उपपत्ति लिङ्ग among the
> > षड्लिङs used for the तात्पर्यनिर्णय of the Shruti.>>,
> > That is just my query. All the षड्लिङs (SaDlinGa) must be used for
> > तात्पर्यनिर्णय (tAtparyanirNaya ) of the Shruti. But here only the
> > लिङ्ग (upapatti linga) among the षड्लिङs (SaDlinGa) is used for the
> > तात्पर्यनिर्णय (tAtparyanirNaya ) of the Shruti. That leads to my query.
> My reply was in the context of the point of contention made by you earlier,
> which was that the logic is used here is like other darShanas, that is
> without Shruti-basis, whereas I said that it is Shruti-based logic since
> Shruti uses this लिङ्ग among the six. It is a different matter whether the
> author of the work chose to use only one or few of the Shruti- लिङ्गs to
> explain a प्रक्रिया. And that by itself need not take away the fact that it
> is based on Shruti.
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known!
> [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list