[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??
aurobind.padiyath at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 07:59:12 CDT 2016
If we see the pot independent of mud, which is not possible and in reality
is name and form of the mudpot, then it has to be defined as MithyA. As
there will have to be the pot existence without mud. So the name and form
called pot of which the base is mud all put together is Sat not MithyA. You
cannot bring water etc with a MithyA pot. Like the snake case. That's why
we are able to carry on Vyavahara even after knowing that the pot is made
Same way for the Jnani, the jagat is nothing but Brahman but the
vyavaharika Jagat is also of the same Brahman. If one sees a jagat (names
and forms) without knowledge and existence of those names and forms (I
don't know how it will be possible),then that jagat is mithya.
Yetra na anypascati = sarvam Brahma,
Yetra anypascati = how can this happen when one Knows the above? As there
is nothing in reality Anya.
On 29 Mar 2016 17:57, "Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> praNAms Sri Ravikiran prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
> For a jnAni, when Brahman is satya always (jnAna nishTa), is there a
> further need to mention jagat satya along with Brahma satya ?
> By stating so, does it further qualify or enhances it, by any means?
> Ø For that matter for the ajnAni also jagat is satya only and from this
> satyatva buddhi in jagat he does the vyavahAra thinking that this jagat is
> his bhOga bhUmi and he is bhOktru, this jagat is karma bhUmi thinking that
> he is kartru / karmi etc. So for his jagat is an independent satya and he
> is an individual enjoyer / sufferer etc. Whereas from the pAramArthika
> drushti of the jnAni, this jagat is not an independent reality and jnAni is
> not an independent enjoyer etc. Because in him there is no jnAtru, jnana,
> jneya triputi vyavahAra. He sees Atman and only Atman in sarva vikAra, for
> him jagat is not MITHYA it is satya in its kAraNa svarUpa. From this
> sarvAtma bhAva, whatever he does is satyameva. sadAtmanA
> satyatvAbhyupagamAt…sarvavyavahArANAM sarvavikArANAM cha
> satyatvaM.clarifies shankara in sUtra bhAshya. He is not declaring here
> jagat is mithyA and his vyavahAra with this jagat is mithyA, it is
> satyameva from the highest point of view that is brahmaikatva drushti.
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list