[Advaita-l] Please Clear this basic doubt

Venkatachalapathi G gvpathi at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 08:50:53 CDT 2015


It is SAT and NOT SAT Alone...
It is Chit and NOT Chit Alone.

Contemplate in this way...

How come something is SAT and Chit together and not a mitya.  ( this
contemplation may lead to some known examples to you but may not be able to
apply Ananda part of it.

Combining these three and identifying a classified object with boundary is
not that easy.  Let me know if any example you encounter.


On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Harsha Bhat via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Sir,
>   Brahman is sat-chit-ananda
> That means,chit is brahman...or in other words,chit is not mithya but it is
> sathya...or very brahman...
> So,in advaita chit is sathya...that means brahman can be categorisable..as
> chit swarupi...
> If brahman is chit swarupi,how can brahman is  non-categorisable?
> As unpanishad says brahman is non-categorisable....
> regards,
> Harsha  Bhat
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list