[Advaita-l] akdhandaakara vRitti - My mistake
lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com
Tue Jul 7 02:15:28 CDT 2015
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Keshava PRASAD Halemane <
k_prasad_h at yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> A knowledge of the ghaTa arises from the ghaTAkAra-vRtti as usually
Wrong sentence written because of lack of understanding.
vRtti is GYAnam, it doesn't give rise to some other GYAnam.
To be precise, you may add vRttyupahitachaitanyam is GYAnam.
> What will be that knowledge of the same ghaTa arising from an
> akhanDAkAra-vRtti associated with it?
Wrong sentence as previous one.
So, it should be 'how do you express ghaTa-viShayaka-akhaNDAkAra-vRtti'?
The best answer is, it can't be expressed.
But, if you need to understand anyhow then consider it as GYAna of ghaTa
without mentioning ghaTatvam as it's dharma.
> Will it be the same knowledge, or different?
akhaNDAkAravRtti or niShprakAraka-vRtti is different from saprakAraka or
sakhaNDa one, otherwise why should we use different words for them.
> I guess that it will be different because of the fact that the
> ghaTAkAra-vRtti is different from the akhanDAkAra-vRtti associated with it.
> If different, how different will be those two from one another?
The difference will be in the way they reveal ghaTa. One will reveal only
ghaTa and other will reveal it with it's quality/ties.
> "ghaTAkAra-vRtti-janya-jnAna of the ghaTa" -and-
> "akhanDAkAra-vRtti-janya-jnAna of the ghaTa".
First learn to use words correctly.
I'm saying this because just a few days ago I corrected someone here. I
thought he will correct this after learning!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list