[Advaita-l] Please Learned Scholars answer these doubts about Advaitha Sidhanta..
harsha9519 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 3 08:29:14 CDT 2015
All the terms you have stated are only negation of all objects that can be
definable. They describe the indescribable using pointers (lakshyaartha)
for a seeker who has tuned his mind.
How sat-chit-ananda is negation of Gunas......
It says Directly as ananda is Brahman's attribute Right???
Similarly nithya trupta and Shanta....how they support neti-nethi..they say
asthi -asthi..righ?t as these as attribute??
How the subject shanta,nithya trupta and sat-chit -ananda are
When we say sat-chit-ananda ...as brahman...how can we call avarchaneeya
Vasthu as sat-chit -ananda??
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Harsha Bhat <harsha9519 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you sir...
> For you for your wonderful explanation....
> Harsha Bhat
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, kuntimaddi sadananda <
> kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Harsha Bhatji - PraNAms
>> Your emails further proves that Vedanta has to be studies systematically
>> under a competent teacher . A competent teacher is one who himself studied
>> Vedanta under another competent teachers.
>> Just for short. Brahman means infinite-ness - anantam. Guna or attributes
>> define an object and differentiate one object from the other. Hence Guna's
>> belong to finite object. Infinite cannot be an object hence it is
>> undefinable - hence nirguna.
>> Infinite itself is not an attribute of infinite - all it means is it
>> negates all finite and therefore attributable objects as not Brahman. All
>> the terms you have stated are only negation of all objects that can be
>> definable. They describe the indescribable using pointers (lakshyaartha)
>> for a seeker who has tuned his mind.
>> Brahman itself is indefinable as stated by the scriptures - na vaak
>> gachchati, na manaH.
>> Similarly the subject I, cannot be defined. Only definition that one can
>> provide is the subject is that which cannot be objectified. It is a
>> negative definition, negating whatever can be objectified cannot be the
>> subject - neti neti says scripture.
>> Hari Om!
>> On Sat, 6/27/15, Harsha Bhat via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>> Subject: [Advaita-l] Please Learned Scholars answer these doubts about
>> Advaitha Sidhanta..
>> To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
>> Date: Saturday, June 27, 2015, 5:02 AM
>> In advaitha Brahman is
>> Termed as Nirguna....the
>> same brahman is called as Nishkala,Nirvikaara,Shanta,Nithya
>> Nishkala meas indivisible,,,,
>> Nirvikaara meas never changing...
>> Nithya Truptha...means Self Satisfied..
>> Nishkriya...without any activity...
>> Sat-chit-ananada....Every Happy....
>> These are not Brahman's attribute???
>> If these are brahman's attribute definitely brahman is not
>> brahman is
>> And even we cannot say brahman as avarchaneeya...because we
>> can call
>> brahman by nirvikaara,shantha...sat-chit-ananda...etc...
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list