[Advaita-l] asti bhAti priyaM in Drg-drsya viveka
H S Chandramouli
hschandramouli at gmail.com
Tue Aug 18 01:27:23 CDT 2015
Sri *Br. Pranipata Chaitanya* Ji,
Reg your observation << One should understand the term bhAti as (anu)bhAti.
The bhAShya to the question - kiM u bhAti vibhAti vA and its answer - taM
eva bhAntaM anubhAti sarvaM (kaThA II.ii.14&15) will throw more light how -
idaM sarvaM tasya bhAsA vibhAti. >> ,
( anu ) bhAti would be appropriate when only the nAma rUpa aspects are
included in the reference to object/experience. However in the verse under
consideration , the bhAntaM aspect of taM is included as an aspect of the
object/experience itself by use of the term bhAti as one of the five
aspects. Hence in this context , in my opinion , use of the term bhAti is
appropriate and should not be understood as (anu)bhAti.
Pranams and Regards
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Br. Pranipata Chaitanya via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >Then how does bhAti (in the verse) is explained? -- durga prasad
> One should understand the term bhAti as (anu)bhAti.
> The bhAShya to the question - kiM u bhAti vibhAti vA and its answer - taM
> eva bhAntaM anubhAti sarvaM (kaThA II.ii.14&15) will throw more light how -
> idaM sarvaM tasya bhAsA vibhAti.
> Hari Om! Pranipata
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list