[Advaita-l] Eka Jiiva Vaada - one perspective.

Venkatesh Murthy vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 23:02:04 CDT 2014


I am confused by 'local mind' and 'global mind'. What is local mind? What
is global mind?

It is not correct to think human mind is not capable of Creating very
complicated Universe. Why? Because human mind can indirectly create very
complicated things. Kindly see the Most Exciting Realization called as
Technological Singularity. It is a time when Computer Intelligence will be
more than Human Intelligence. After this happens the 'future course of
human history is unpredictable or even unfathomable'. Robots may become
intelligent than Humans. But who created Computer nd Robots? Humans.


Like this it is possible the Jeeva can imagine and create very complicated
things like Computers and even God. The Power of Imagination is coming from
Maayaa. It is the Cause. But Maayaa is also imagined by Jeeva's Avidyaa.

The whole Universe is a mental Construction only in the mind of one Jeeva.

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:53 PM, kuntimaddi sadananda <
kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:

>                  Eka jiiva vaada
> First - an acknowledgement - this current writing is prompted by the posts
> on creation and cognition by local tiny jiiva based on Bhagavatam (Uddhava
> Geeta) sloka, with many indirect supportive teachings. and my discussions
> in advaitaL list. Yesterday, I had a chance to discuss this issue with
> Shree Swami Paramarthanandaji about the jest of the eka-jiiva vaada. Since
> Swamiji is not a member of any list, I would paraphrase this write-up as my
> understanding of what Swamiji discussed. Needless to say, that it is left
> to the reader to accept or reject the statements.
> There was a consideration that creation involves only one jiiva, the
> subject and the other entities constituting the world forming the objects
> of his cognition. Ignorance of that jiiva involves parichchinnatvam or
> notion of limitation that I am only this body, mind and intellect, while
> the rest of the creation constitutes objects of his cognition. As usual,
> samsaara or suffering comes by giving absolute reality to the cognized
> world of plurality. Teaching to that jiiva is that whatever that is
> cognized is not really real but mithyaa; since whatever cognized is inert
> and there cannot be any real inert entities since consciousness is infinite
> - prajnaanam brahma.
> Here we need to recognize three aspects that are involved in this model;
> a) creation of plurality b) cognition of that plurality by senses and his
> mind c) teaching to that jiiva that any cognized entity is not really real.
> Realization, as usual, involves recognition that I am Brahman, and anything
> else is naama rupa mithyaa, and I am the substratum even for the mithyaa
> world of plurality.
> There are several concerns and questions that arise from this model. Some
> of them, were discussed in the past. These include a) jiiva creating the
> world of plurality and then cognizing what he has created, and assuming
> that the world of plurality that is cognized in real. To that jiiva there
> is a teaching that it is not real but mithyaa.
> 1) First concern that comes up is if he is the creator and then cognizing
> the creation, the teaching does not differ from vijnaana vaada of Buddhism.
> 2) Second concern is if he is the creator of the whole universe, he must
> be sarva jnana or all knower, since creation requires the whole knowledge
> of creation. He has to create from himself - that is he has to be abhinna
> nimitta upaadana kaaraNa of the universe - that is both material and
> intelligent cause for the universe. If so he is taking the role of Iswara
> of that creation while being a local tiny jiiva.
> 3) Being the material cause also, he is the adhiShTaanam of the universe
> too - here we are not referring to sat chit ananda swaruupa aatma but eka
> jiiva of that creation since in this model he is the creator.
> 4) Another concern is creation should take place after he became a tiny
> jiiva since the model involves the creation and cognition by the tiny jiiva
> who has to be pre-existing before creation starts.
> 5) The item 4 leads to anyonya aashraya dosha or mutual dependency, like A
> depends on B and B depends of A - This is because the jiiva has to be
> created first for him to create the rest that includes in BMI which is part
> of cognized world. Jiiva hood itself is due to identification with upAdhis,
> BMI, as I am this. Thus he creates himself to create the rest including his
> BMI for him to cognize.
> 6) He must have become ignorant after he created the universe, that makes
> the ignorance to have beginnig. Knowledgeable person cannot become
> ignorant. If he becomes, then there is no question of moksha for him since
> he can always become ignorant even after gaining knowledge. It is an
> eternal struggle.
> 7) Next important concern is who the teacher for this single jiiva is.
> Non-jiiva cannot teach and there is no other jiiva, even for him to realize
> and then teach.
> I recognize some of the concerns are interdependent but I am only
> highlighting them to recognize the problems that one encounters. The basic
> problem is statement that he creates and then cognizes.
> Because of the limited time encounter, Swamiji answered briefly my
> concerns grasping the essence of them. He said in the deep sleep state
> there is only kaaraNa shariira which is essentially ignorance of all
> duality as we discussed in the series - who slept well?. The ignorance
> being undifferentiated, since there is no duality, the ignorance at both
> individual level and collective level is one homogenous ignorance. From the
> collective point it is called maayaa, which is nothing but parameswara
> Shakti. Hence in Madukya aagama prakarana the kaaraNa state is also defined
> from the macro scale as Iswara. Creation is by that Iswara and not by the
> local mind of the jiiva, even in the eka jiiva vaada - the reason, he said,
> is that even the local mind has to be created. We are back to the original
> theory that creation is not by the local jiiva but by Iswara who is
> sarvajna and sarva Shaktimaan. Eka jiiva comes from the point that there is
> only one subject from
>  his perspective and everything he cognizes is object of his perception.
> The teaching he receives is also via his sense perception and his cognition
> and therefore objectifiable entity. To the question that who is the teacher
> then, he just smiled and says your guess is as good as mine. He
> categorically denied that it is not that local jiiva creates and then
> cognizes since the cognitive instruments need to be created too. He agreed
> that if we accept creation and then cognition by that jiiva, then it will
> not be different from vijnana vaada of Buddhism.
> I left him since there were others in line seeking his attention.
> Since there is not much for me to shed more light, accepting that my
> knowledge of the eka jiiva vaada is limited to the above, I will stop here.
> With prostrations to Shree Swamiji for educating me on this topic and
> thanks to Shree Subbuj for patiently but unsuccessfully trying to educate
> me on this topic.
> Hari Om!
> Sadananda
> ----------------------------------
> What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is
> your gift to Him. He only accepts that which is right or dharmic. Make Him
> feel bad by giving better gift than what He gave you. He appreciates that
> more. Hari Om!
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list