[Advaita-l] Akramadruk in Naishkarmya Siddhi
bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com
Wed Feb 26 04:45:57 CST 2014
In this bhashyam Shankara says turye
viditE svayameva AtamasvarUpameva sarvajnatA - remember the seventh
definition of turiya has the word 'prapanchopashamam'.
praNAms Sri subbu prabhuji
I think we are digressing the main question of Sri Venkatesh Murthy
prabhuji and again starting on brahman's sarvajnatva :-)) Anyway, what
exactly does it mean when it is said prapanchOpashamanaM in tureeya ??
And what exactly is the difference between upAdhi upashamana, antaHkaraNa
upashamana in prAjnA in sushupti and prapanchOpashamanaM in tureeya?? do
you think tureeya would experience the atyanta abhAva of prapancha or it
is mere upashamanaM as we see in prAjna with regard to upAdhi in
sushupti?? And I am still at loss how come the term 'sarva' can intrude
in tureeya when he is neither antaH prajnA, nor bahirprajna nor prajnAna
ghana etc. ?? Have you said anywhere in your previous mails about
sarvajnatA svarUpa of Atman (OK not Ishwara's like sarvajnatvaM) when you
earlier vehemently argued that 'sarva' can be attributed ONLY to saguNa
brahman and who is vyAvahArika satya whereas jneya brahman is kevala jnAna
svarUpa?? When I quoted Itareya and bhAshya at that time also you
comfortably given convoluted interpretation of that bhAshya vAkya & hardly
spoken about the sarvajnatva of Atman in one or the other form !!?? So,
it is still difficult for me to understand your position prabhuji.
Perhaps, a detailed write up with regard to Atman's sarvajnatva &
Ishwara's sarvajnatva would be beneficial to all of us to understand about
the existence of two different sarvajna-s :-)) Hope you would do the
If you want you can change the subject heading so that we can discuss all
these in a separate thread, ofcourse if my time permits for the continuity
of this thread :-))
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list