[Advaita-l] Who Slept Very Well? - Part IV

Nithin Sridhar sridhar.nithin at gmail.com
Tue Feb 25 02:24:02 CST 2014

Hmmm :D

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> So, what was the outcome of 1960's debate?
> praNAms
> Hare Krishna
> Not known exactly :-)) according to one small book let ( which Sri
> chandramouLi prabhuji sent to me) it was kAryAlaya pundit (Sri vittala
> shAstri) accepted his defeat and did not rise any further question on
> mUlAvidyA, kAraNAvidya or bhAva rUpa avidyA in sushupti.  So shrungeri
> pundits (Sri Ramachandra shAstri etc.) are victorious :-))  There is one
> more subsequent book after this debate (title : mUlAvidyA vimarsheya
> vimarshe in Kannada)  which denies this claim and that book has been
> written by the same Sri vittala shAstri (later in sanyAsAshrama - Sri
> jnAnAnandendra saraswati) hints that there was almost acceptance of
> non-existence of mUlAvidyA in shankara bhAshya  by then shrungeri
> jagadguru HH Sri abhinava vidyA teertha swamiji :-))  Credentials of both
> of these works god only knows :-))
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list