[Advaita-l] Samit Pani, do we really have to stretch this ??
bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com
Mon Oct 28 07:02:33 CDT 2013
As far as I am aware of, Upanishads say that, he who wishes to take
and practice Moksha-Sadhana, he must take samidha to the Guru. The Sticks
represent the Karmas of the Student. The Guru will burn the stick, their
burning all the blocking Karmas of the Student. The ritual denotes that
Guru by burning the blocking Karmas of a student, now takes him along the
path to Moksha.
It is a good esoteric explanation indeed. But I am really wondering do we
really need symbolical explanations like this for each and every utterance
of shruti? I dont think so!! we dont have to read too much into 'samit
pANi' issue, when 'vishaya' in this shruti statement is something else.
This maNtra saying how important it is to have a brahma nishTa guru in
brahma jignAsa and indispensability of the shrOtreeya / brahmanIshTa guru
in brahma jignAsa. Here vishaya vAkya is not about : 'what shishya
should hold in his hand or what he should wear when approaching a guru,
but here insistence and importance is all about having a brahma nishTa
guru by a shishya in brahma jignAsa. If I can give a loukika example, if
I say to someone : "yesterday I had been to Ashram with fruits to have the
darshan & AshirvAdam of swamiji...nobody would in turn ask, why 'fruits'
why not sweets/flower etc. Because it is evident here in this statement
that, 'yesterday', 'with fruits' in my hand etc. are 'gaUNa' vivaraNa and
mukhya 'vishaya' is 'darshana of the guru'. . If the samit in the hand
is the must for the shishya for brahma jignAsa, shruti would have insisted
that invariably in other instances also like in taitireeya 'varuNam
pitaramupasasAra' etc. Hence, I think this 'samit pAni' is just a passing
explanation by shruti and digging deep on this issue with a 'samit' in the
pANi is not required :-))
Just my few thoughts on this and open for correction.
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list