[Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Wed May 1 13:13:01 CDT 2013
I think the book should be worth reading. In the following line from the preface Shri Sankaranarayanan seems to say that Adi Sankaracharya did not think Vedavyasa to be the author of the Brahmasutra.
The early Vedantin-s like Upavarsa and Sri Samkara held Badarayana to be the author of the
Sariraka Brahma Sutra and considered him as different form Veda Vyasa.
From: Kathirasan K <brahmasatyam at gmail.com>
To: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] concluding sloka of siddhAnta bindu
Sankaranarayanan takes the view with textual evidence that the both Badarayana and Vyasa are different individuals.
His paper was published as a book. Here is the link: http://www.exoticindia.com/book/details/badarayana-and-vyasa-as-authors-of-brahmasutra-historical-analysis-IDK561/
Sent from my iPad
On 1 May, 2013, at 4:43 AM, kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sunilji - PraNAms.
> As for as I know, Bhagavatpaada Shankara went along with the traditional view prevailing at that time that the author of Brahmasuutra is Veda vyaasa only. I could be wrong.
> Hari Om!
>> From: Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>
>> What did Adi Sankaracharya say would be of importance to us.
>> Sunil KB
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list