[Advaita-l] (Advaita-1)-Vedas are not apaurusheya?
swami.sarvabhutananda at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 06:02:12 CST 2013
NOT ACCEPTS! UNDERSTANDS THAT THE ATMA IS SVATAHSIDDAH.RECOGNISES!!!
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Srikanta Narayanaswami <
srikanta.narayanaswami at yahoo.com> wrote:
> In the final analysis, the mukta requires no theses because he accepts
> nothing but the svataHsiddha Atman. Even his prAmAtRtvam his
> transcended, so other axioms and theses which pre-suppose pramAtRtvam
> are not even in the picture.
> Sri Siva Senani Nori wrote:
> <<Sankaracharya does not attempt to prove the theses (listed above) of
> Advaita independently of Sruti. The thesis is established by
> interpreting Sruti - that is, Brahman is Absolutely Real because Sruti
> says so, and so on.>>
> 'In the final analysis,the mukta requires no theses because he accepts
> nothing but the "svatahsiddha"Atman.
> >Just like other axioms,this also is an "Axiom".Because,this statement is
> taken by what is stated in some book.It cannot be verified.
> As explained above, the "three main points" do not constitute a thesis
> in the first place. The role of the shruti is only to serve as a
> deconditioning therapy, to remind us that even our pramAtRtvam is
> >No where it is stated that the role of the "shruthi"is only to serve as a
> deconditioning therapy.On the other hand the role of the shruthi is to
> bring knowledge,which is positive,not negative.
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
WELCOME YOUR INTERACTION.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list