[Advaita-l] Is there a Cityupanisad?

PNKKrishnadas pnk.krishnadas at gmail.com
Wed Sep 26 06:16:52 CDT 2012

Thank you, Ramaji.   A nice piece of detective work there.



-----Original Message-----
From: advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
[mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org] On Behalf Of
Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2012 8:45 PM
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Is there a Cityupanisad?

The reference says it all. The third chapter in the taittiriya
aaraNyakam is called the cityupanishad, although I have not heard of
it being referred to by that name.

The chapter starts citti sruk, cittamaajyam, ..., which may explain
the name.

The mantra being referred to is in the anuvaakam which begins suvarNaM
gharmaM pariveda venam, ... The exact reference is probably sarve
vedaa yatraikam bhavanti, sa maanasiina aatmaa janaanaam.

The entire chapter is about the inner meaning of Vedic yajnas.

No need for any costly photocopying. You can find the saayana
bhaashyam for the taittiriiya through google.


On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, PNKKrishnadas <p at gmail.com> wrote:
> As requested, here is the reference in the Taittiriya Upanisad,
> II.iii.1 (Translation and Commentary by Swami Gambhirananda):
> "....the Vedic text, "Where all the Vedas get united is the Self in 
> the mind" (Cityupanisad, XI. 1, Tai. A. III. ii, 1) which declares
> identity of the Rg-mantras etc., with the eternal Self, can be 
> reconciled only if the mantras are eternal."
> Thank you.
> Krishnadas
> *********************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> From: advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
> [mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org] On Behalf Of 
> Venkata sriram P
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:30 PM
> To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
> Subject: [Advaita-l] Is there a Cityupanisad?
> Namaste Krishnadas Ji,
> If you can type the excerpts from the commentary, it would be of 
> immense help.
> I can see only 2 options here:
> 1) The word *city* might be a true translation of the word *pura* in

> sanskrit.  So, it could
>     have been Tripura Upanishad.
> or
> 2) It could have been a sandhi of *iti+upaniSad* which is read as 
> *ityupanishad*.
>     The word *C* could be either a typo or parenthesis (left
> This is my understanding as i havn't gone through the book.
> regs,
> sriram
> ________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list