[Advaita-l] Why is jagat mithya?
Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at braincells.com
Wed Jan 18 17:47:50 CST 2012
[was: Re: [Advaita-l] The point of discussions]
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Bhaskar YR wrote:
> Yes, I too surprised to see Sri Vidya prabhuji's sudden decision on this
60+ messages is hardly sudden.
> But oflate, I could see some point in Sri Venkatesh prabhuji's argument.
> Basically he is asking us, when we say brahman is the abhinnanimittOpadAna
> kAraNa of this jagat and shruti says there is nothing 'apart' from brahman
> (sarvaM khalvidaM brahma)why we should say jagat (nAma rUpa) is mithya??
> Can we answer his queries keeping this point of view in mind??
Well Shruti does not say only that in fact it talks about a lot of things
which appear not to be Brahman. How can we talk about non-Brahman? Why
does it seem that the knowledge that we find via pratyaksha pramana
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list