[Advaita-l] Traditional Scholarship vs Modern Pseudo-Intellectualism
vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 13 20:25:47 CST 2011
2011/11/13 श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com>:
> *श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com>
> lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 08:23, Venkatesh Murthy <vmurthy36 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The question you are asking is depth or breadth better? It is always
>> better to know one thing in great depth than to know a hundred things
>> in breadth.
> And depth can not come without breadth here.
> Any determination in one school can not come without refuting conflicting
> schools. And to refute those schools one needs to study them without bias
> to first school. So, both are needed.
No. Prakarana Grantha can be sufficient for understanding our school.
No need to know other schools.
>> They say if you know only one mantra that is Gayatri Mantra and
>> practice it sincerely not knowing any other mantra that is sufficient.
>> No need to know anything more.
> But, how could one practice gAyatrI without having determined validity of
> veda-s ?
Faith in Gayatri Mantra is sufficient. There was one discussion
recently. अनन्ता वै वेदाः | It is impossible to know complete Vedas.
But Gayatri is the essence of all Vedas.
> Spirituality is not a goal unique to all. Why are you making it a scale ?
>> The Western Academic Professors may be
>> scholars but they
>> are not practicing the knowledge. They are good for clearing exams and
>> getting marks.
> Do you mean that they can't understand because they don't practice ? Are
> you practicing everything you know ? Or, is it ever possible to do so ? If
> not, why are you insisting it for foreigners ?
We Indians may not practicing also. But there are some Indian scholars
practicing. We can study from them. Why go to foreigners?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list