[Advaita-l] Can a mithyA-vastu produce an effect? असत्यवस्तुनः अर्थक्रियाकारित्वम्

श्रीमल्ललितालालितः lalitaalaalitah at gmail.com
Sun May 22 10:36:17 CDT 2011

*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com>
lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*

2011/5/22 Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>

> Hari OM,
> Simple. Because veda didn't prescribe it as an  alternative of soma.
> >
> Precisely so; its not because everything is in everything, but only because
> veda says what is an alternative to soma.

But why did veda prescribe it ?
Because  everything is everything due to trivR^itkaraNam.

> Again, not because everything is in everything but the defect of the eye
> (as
> per vishishTa advaita as I understand from the above) reveals one thing
> instead of the other. It can't surely be both.

Defective eyes reveal silver in shell because it is there.
Both are true. see evidence :
Everything is in everything because of trivR^itkaraNam. and trivR^itkaraNam
is proved by shruti.
defect of eye is necessary because silver residing in shell is not revealed
by common eyes. so, it is proved by anyathAnupapatti.

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list