[Advaita-l] Questions on Mayavada.
sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 8 02:53:33 CST 2010
Dharmakaya is not all the states.Dharmakaya is not physical frame nor it is mental frame. It is in the state of achieving Shunyata . You are wrong in your understanding. Further how can you say Mahayana Buddhism to be similar to Jainism?
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
--- On Sun, 11/7/10, srikanta <srikanta at nie.ac.in> wrote:
From: srikanta <srikanta at nie.ac.in>
Subject: [Advaita-l] Questions on Mayavada.
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 11:53 PM
Dear Sunil Bhattacharji,
You are unnecessarily referring my name to Sri Shivasenani,when the
discussion is between you and me.I now understand that discussing the
word"Bodhikaya"or "Dharmakaya"is useless with you.You have not followed my
explanation and you are interested in evading in some manner or the
other.Instead of putting in so many words,I have explained in gist what
"Dharmakaya"is.I explained to you that "Dharmakaya" is physical,mental and
intellectual frames supporting an individual.In short,"Dharma"is Atma or
the whole being which includes your "Sambhoga kaya"etc.Donot mix up
chronology with philosophy.You say that SriKrishna lived million years
before Buddha.See,you are bringing unnecessary things in the
discussions.If you have read Mahayana Buddhism as you claim,you cannot
escape similar terms in Jainism.Why you are mixing up Mahayana Buddhism
with Adi Shankara?Both are poles apart.If you want to discuss with me let
it be meaningful.Do not pickup some word and digress from
there.Remember,it was you who raised the word"Dharmakaya".
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list