[Advaita-l] bharata or lakshmaNa who is elder ??

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 1 10:13:28 CDT 2010

Dear friends,
He is absolutely wrong. It appears that he does not understand Hindu Astronomy at all.
Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

--- On Sat, 7/31/10, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

From: Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
Subject: [Advaita-l] bharata or lakshmaNa who is elder ??
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>, advaitin at yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 31, 2010, 12:55 AM

Hare Krishna

Y'day I was listening to Sri Bannanje GovindAchArya's pravachana on 
rAmAyaNa..He makes one important observation against popular belief that 
bharata is elder to lakshmaNa...He says bharata is infact younger to 
lakshmaNa and there is not even a single sentence that proves that bharata 
is elder to lakshmaNa in mUla vAlmeeki rAmAyaNa.  OTOH, when rAma & 
lakshmaNa both return after rAvaNa vadha to ayOdhya bharata offers praNAms 
to 'both' rAma & lakshmaNa addressing them as 'arya'.  He also says that 
lakshmaNa and shatrugna are not twins & there is 9 to 10 months gap 
between their birth :-))  and there is no mention of 'lakshmaNa rekha' 
episode as such in mUla rAmAyaNa...Would appreciate any valid inputs with 
regard to this.

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list