[Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)

Dr. Yadu Moharir ymoharir at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 15 13:39:23 CDT 2009

Dear Bhadraiah-Ji
The name "romasha" as mentioned is correct.
This suukta is known as "svanaya daanasuti".  R^iShii for this suukta is kaxiivat aushija,  King full name is given as "svanaya bhavayavya" and chhanda for the reference R^ichaa 6 & 7 is anuShTubh.  
Dr. Yadu

--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com>
Subject: [Advaita-l] Pancikarana vs. Trivrtkarana (analysis)
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 11:01 AM

The word romasha is suspect in the first place. 

If something (hair in private parts) can not be explained by Shruti that becomes not_Brahman right? Can such a thing exist?



Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Explorer 8. 
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list