[Advaita-l] Re: svanubhavah and brahmAtma samsthitih

Siva Senani Nori sivasenani at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 16 07:25:34 CDT 2007

Thiru Amudan

You are right; deSa, kAla, and vastu are oft quoted paricchedas, whereas the three guNas are not usually referred to as paricchedas. I stand corrected and better informed. Thank you.


----- Original Message ----
From: Amuthan <aparyap at gmail.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:17:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Re: svanubhavah and brahmAtma samsthitih

On 3/15/07, Siva Senani Nori <sivasenani_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
([why?] Due to the falsity of those four on account of the saguNa
brahma being their object, and due to the non-presence of the form of
Brahman devoid of the three divisions {I think, satva-rajo-tama
guNas}in saguNa [brahman].

i think AchArya is referring to the absence of desha, kAla and vastu
parichCheda in nirguNa brahman when he uses the term

Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org

Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list