SSS and Madhva (was Re: [Advaita-l] Review of MarthaDoherty'scomments on Sri Satchidanandendra Sarasvati)

Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian rama.balasubramanian at
Fri Mar 9 07:29:49 CST 2007

Dear Bhaskar,

I wish you would read stuff as it is, and not give your own bhaaShyas
to them (as with Sureshvaras verse). I merely said that I would not
comment on the sampradaayic validity of SSS anymore, and not on
whether his interpretations make any sense.

BTW, your concern is touching and don't worry. It's almost ready. I
sent it to Kartik about a month back, and he made a number of valuable
suggestions  very quickly. Unfortunately it requires quite a bit of
work on my part, but it should get ready soon.


PS: Sarcasm-and-politeness-police please take note. But, I guess
sarcasm is ok when it comes from SSS, or his followers (as seen
below), but terribly, terribly wrong when it comes from me.

On 3/9/07, bhaskar.yr at <bhaskar.yr at> wrote:
> I have my opinions on this, and I haven't seen anyone give any proper
> reasons to change it. In any case, I'll take your advice, and there
> will be no more posts from me regarding the sampradaayic validity or
> otherwise of SSS's doctrines.
> praNAms Sri Ramakrishna Balasubramanian prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
> Kindly dont skip your long pending assured article on *vyAkhyAna Vs SSS*
> according to shankara...I am still eagerly awaiting your paper...since you
> have already made tall claims against SSS....I would like to see some
> weightage behind your claims...Hope you do it ASAP.
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
> _______________________________________________
> Archives:
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at

More information about the Advaita-l mailing list