[Advaita-l] BrahmaGYAna and jIvanmukti - 5 (Other References)
rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com
Wed Feb 7 15:13:59 CST 2007
Any basis for this assertion? Hopefully from works of SSS himself?
I can produce about a dozen quotes which imply all writing after
Sureshvara are useless.
On 2/6/07, Stig Lundgren <slu at bredband.net> wrote:
> Dear Kartik,
> I´m afraid my only intention here was to point out that even though Swami
> Satchidanandendra Saraswati did refute the opinion that Vivekachudamani is a
> work by Shankaras pen, and even though he didn´t approve of all standpoints
> presented in Jivanmuktiviveka, he nevertheless considered those two works to
> be most important works within the Advaita Vedanta tradition. He did not
> consider as useless all works written after Sureshvara, as some people seems
> to believe.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list