[Advaita-l] Re: Pa~nchapAdikAchArya
rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com
Sun Oct 15 17:35:22 CDT 2006
Can you point out where I said that SSS is wrong because he "went
Sankara is clear that brahma-j~naana is to be obtained through a
sapradaayavit only. My observation was that a sampradaayavit is not a
BOOK written by a putative brahma-j~naani. Question is very simple:
shankara is clear on the need to personally approach a sampradaayavit.
Who did SSS approach?
Can we leave irrelevant details on logical fallacies out of the
picture here?. As far as I can see only Vidyasankar seems to have
understood what I have been saying, although I have taken great pains
to write the same thing over and over and over again.
On 9/30/06, Abhishek RK <rkabhi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Namaste Sri Ramakrishnan,
> I am eagerly awiting your critique of Sacchidanandendra's writings. Just to
> put things in perspective, criticising his approach by claiming he goes
> against "tradition" is a logical fallacy. See:
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list