[Advaita-l] GITA - 2.21
satyan_c at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 27 00:00:04 CST 2006
Namaste Sri Amuthan,
I enjoy following your Gita Postings, especially the points brought out from the various bhAshyAs. Please keep up the good work and I must congratulate you on getting involved in these topics at your age.
In this particular discussion, are we mixing up the Self and 'Self Knowledge'. Clearly the Self is beyond the intellect. However, 'Self Knowledge' is required for someone who has 'Self Ignorance'. Only the one who thinks that he is bound needs liberation.
In that sense, 'Self Knowledge' is required for the one who is has wrongly assessed the Self in his own intellect. The one who has been superimposing all kinds of subtle and/or gross things on the Self and is suffering from samsAra (ie a samsAri) is the one who needs Self Knowledge. The Self doesn't need Self Knowledge. The one who erroneously thinks 'I am Limited a limited jIva' needs it.
What is the locus of Self Ignorance? It is the intellect. Hence, where else can be the locus of Self Knowledge (or Atma jnAnam, which are synonymous)?
I had written a brief note on this topic once, which is available at:
Amuthan <aparyap at yahoo.co.in> wrote: namo nArAyaNAya!
dear shrI rAm garib,
--- Ram Garib wrote:
> This particular modification of mind which has been
> called "akhandaakaara vritti" is also a vritti,
> it? Since a vritti can occur only in mind, how can
> be called non-intellectual? "manasa eva
> anudrashtavyam" clearly rules out any mysterious
> connotations associated with self-knowledge. Only
> thing that differentiates self-knowledge from others
> is the nature of akhandaakara vritti which does not
> have a subject-object relationship.
akhaNDAkAra vR^Itti is indeed a modification of the
mind only. it is intellectual, but it is NOT the same
as Atma j~nAna. all references to the shruti that
apparently suggest that self knowledge is intellectual
refer only to this akhaNDAkAra vR^itti. the self is,
by it's own nature, a j~nAna svarUpa and does not
require a buddhi to know itself. if we maintain that
self knowledge is only intellectual, we cannot explain
shruti-s like 'satyaM j~nAnam anantaM brahma'. here,
calling the self as 'j~nAnam' does not mean that we
have to superimpose a buddhi onto the self and assert
that the knowledge exists there. this j~nAna is
intrinsic to the self. the confusion arises because
both self knowledge and intellectual knowledge are
used with the same name - 'j~nAna'.
btw, there is nothing mysterious about all these it
provided you don't call the self mysterious :-)
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list