[Advaita-l] Re: Buddhism Related Discussions
rkabhi at gmail.com
Tue Aug 15 19:35:01 CDT 2006
On 8/15/06, Lakshminarayana <narayana_kl_71 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If you interpret lending
> existence as meaning dependance i.e., that the jIvas
> have no independant existence, then the above
> statements are more closer to dvaita than to bauddha
Actually, if we interpret it this way, this would be closer to advaita.
> My impression is that you are seeing bauddha doctrine
> in Rameshji's statements when there is none.
Maybe I am, because I don't know much of the bauddha doctrine.
satyena dhAryate pR^ithvi satyena tapate raviH|
satyena vAti vAyushca sarvaM satye pratishThitam||
calA lakShmIshcalAH prANAshcalaM jIvita yauvanaM|
calAcale ca saMsAre dharma eko hi nishcalaH||
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list