Goodness (was Re: [Advaita-l] 'End' not 'Means')
sjayana at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 29 12:26:18 CDT 2006
--- Aditya Varun Chadha <adichad at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Possibility A: "The murderer should be rewarded with a large sum
> > money."
> > Possibility B: "The murderer should be punished with prison
> > Neither possibility could be derived by any amount of scientific
> > analysis. Science can help us understand what has happened, what
> > happening, and what will happen if certain conditions are met,
> > cannot answer what SHOULD be done in the situation described
> > On matters pertaining to justice most societies have judges and
> > juries that can examine the evidence and counsel on the right
> Do a thought experiment. You reward the murderer with money. Put
> yourself in the murderer's situation. A large sum of money would do
> you good. so you extrapolate that the large sum of money would do
> murderer good, and so the murderer would be motivated to commit the
> crime again. But letting and encouraging a murderer to commit
> isn't really good because he could in principle some day kill you.
Please define "good".
And then show how "goodness" can be placed in a museum so that people
can come over to "see" and "hear" that goodness!
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list