kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 21 13:29:50 CST 2003
--- "M. S. Ravisankar" <ravi at ambaa.org> wrote:
> ajnAna can also be taken as absence of jnAna rather than opposite of
> To give an example, darkness is absence of light. There is no such
> thing as
> darkness by itself.
> My 2c.
Ravi - your comments are interesting. Question whether aj~naana is just
the absence of knowledge or presence of ignorance- is a very subtle
issue. Is it 'bhaava ruupa' that veils the knowledge or abhaavaruupa
there is just the lack of knowledge has been debated. According to
Advaita - knowledge is considered as eternal ever existent entity - it
cannot be said as absence of knowledge (that which is non-existent can
never come into existence), but then one is cornered in bringing
aj~naana as positive quantity that covers the ever present knowledge.
That brings another problme - if aj~naana is an existent entity then it
can never cease to exist. 'aj~naana' is muddled with aj~naana! -
anirvachaniiyam may be the best escape!
What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda.
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list