Nature of Consciousness
ramakris at EROLS.COM
Thu Jul 29 18:54:15 CDT 1999
Anand V. Hudli <anandhudli at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> I think it is not entirely accurate to call any mImAMsakas
> in the sense that the term "atheist" is used today. The anIshvara
> mImAMsakas are not so much interested to deny God as the atheists
> today are. For such mImAMsakas, it does not matter whether God
> or not. They hold that the fruits of actions are automatically
> by some unseen potency called "adR^ishhTa". Shankara has dealt
> position of the anIshvara mImAMsakas in his sUtra bhAShya.
Anand, I assumed from my reading of Hiriyanna that apUrva is the same
as adR^ishhTa. Is there a major difference between the two?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list