viprataa (was Re: Sadhana)
Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at BRAINCELLS.COM
Mon Jun 1 13:43:06 CDT 1998
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian wrote:
> Anand Hudli wrote:
> > 6) It may appear that 4) contradicts 2). But this cannot be the case.
> > HH the Swami of Sringeri, himself a scholar in tarka-shAstra, can
> > never contradict Shankara. So we should interpret 4) in the manner
> > indicated by 5). That is, by studying the jnAna-yoga granthas, one
> > may get krama mukti. In other words, the study of such works
> > _eventually_ leads one to mokSha, not to jIvanmukti. Perhaps, by
> > such study, one gets an excellent birth in an excellent family in
> > the next life. Then every opportunity to study VedAnta directly
> > will become a certainty.
> Not so. In fact by yoga vAshishhTha moxa _may_ be obtained right now by
> _anyone_. The prime example is vidura and dharmavyAdha who were GYAni-s
> (accepted by shrI sha.nkara). They may not have used the YV, but they
> could not have used upanishhad-s either. The so called "contradiction"
> is resolved not by assuming krama mukti. It means that they heard the
> mahAvAkya-s in some previous birth, but because their minds were not
> pure enough, produced results in the next birth only. shrI sureshvara
> has explained this in naishhkarmya siddhi II.2-5. Here he raises a pUrva
> paxa objection giving examples where people are known to have attained
> GYAna and implies that they must have heard the mahAvAkya-s previously.
> Apparently sarvaGYAtma muni makes this very explicit and states that
> those who seem to attain moxa without mahAvAkya-s must have heard it in
> their previous life (sorry, I can't give exact references).
> So _anyone_ may obtain moxa here and now.
It seems to me both your view and Anands can be accepted without fear of
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list