ShriirAma establishes a Jyotirlinga - Rameswaram
anandhudli at HOTMAIL.COM
Thu Apr 9 10:02:01 CDT 1998
Ram Chandran wrote:
>Anand Hudli <anandhudli at HOTMAIL.COM> writes:
>> You are wrong on several counts here! ........... (omitted)
>Though you have stated that I am wrong, I assume that you just
>with what I said. We agree and disagree with our family members and
>will not disrupt any healthy relationship.It is human nature to agree
>and disagree. This is also a part of human weekness.
>The questions that I have raised are just hypothetical but they are
>real and they could come from someone who is not familiar with Hindu
>traditions and Sankara's various writings. Such a person is likely
>utter confused because he/she may not understand the subtle
>connections. The whole purpose of this list is to remove ignorance and
>to help members to a right path of life. The point that I have raised
>in my posting is to help Ravi to understand the complexity of
>issues so that he can prepare a policy with a broader scope. This is
>definitely not a criticism against you for posting such a fine
>article. I was rather surprised that an intelligent and scholarly
>person like you to become emotional and make unnecessary accusations
>and subjective judgments of my behavior. I have directly and
>indicated that I liked your article. I honestly wanted to make sure
>that these articles should have a place under the new guidelines come
>I am sorry to say that several of your statments are unnecessarily
>harsh and could have been avoided. I have no control over your
>opinions and your judgements. I always believed that you are an
>intelligent and scholarly person and I will continue to believe the
>same. If think that I am responsible for your misunderstanding, I
>want to apologize to you for my imprecise writing style. With the
>Grace of God, I hope to continue to keep a good opinion of you.
>I just wanted to make point and I have made my point and I want to
>and live in peace.
I apologize to you for making some harsh statements yesterday.
This is what happens when we come under the sway of the ego.
On being emotional about this Buddhism, I think it is wise not be
so, either way. I do not have anything against Buddhism in itself.
It is only for what I think is the benefit of the list members that
I felt necessary to concentrate on advaita, and not extraneous
issues. It is also not necessary to learn anything about Buddhism or
any other doctrine in order to be able to understand advaita.
Most of the prakaraNa granthas written by Shankara and others keep
it plain and simple, by teaching just advaita Vedaanta. So we do
not lose anything by not discussing, say Confucius, in the context
You have given the example of how questions may be asked by students
in a classroom discussion. I have myself taught at a university
before. It is common practice and not considered as stifling anyone
to ask a student whose questions do not pertain to the class topic to
meet after the class and discuss them in private. This does not
mean the student is being insulted or anything. It is only to keep
a proper focus in the classroom. I hope I have made myself clear.
Again, I am sorry for making some harsh statements yesterday which
were not necessary.
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list