[Advaita-l] Dying to Live Peacefully - III

KAMESWARARAO MULA kamesh_ccmb at yahoo.co.in
Sat Jan 6 06:37:27 EST 2018


Dear Sir's,
"( Btw , nAstikas like Amartya Sen have a stupidtake on the Gita and say
that the Gita is a dishonest book and it asks us to act without bothering
about the consequences etc etc....)
Yes, Amartya sen may be a  noble laurette in his 'ardha sastra', but I have of the opinion that, He may not a basic qualification in 'advait-vedant'/adhyatmikata or Hindu Dharma. He has taken a wrong stand on Gita as it the fundamental doctrine to bear out our Karma. How ever, commenting Gita as a dishonet book may be an offense of Crime. Why because, I will explain this to the follwing question?

Is there any shAstra reference to what constitutes dhArmickilling? Like
meting out just deserts for an AtatAyin, maybe? Sir,            Nothing constitutes Dharmic Killing???. What is this???.Please try to understand that no one can kill any one. If you kill some one, you have to bear its fruits of that action as there is no escape for karma which gita explains nicely.
DHARMA never say to do any job or any action or it never instructs to do like this or don't do this. It is a DOCTRINE OF PRINCIPLE's which can be obtained only by 'ACHARAN', It can only see, can give the direction/path, can keep silent in difficult situations which is not it's concerned. 
We all should try to understand the fact that Lord Krishna has only pushed Arjuna to his DUTY , there by he can reduce the karmic load on this  mother Bhumi. He has never killed any one or may promoted an action which is going to Happen in TIME . He is purushottma, Narayana swarupa, Jagat GURU. One has to understand the fact that by doing all these wars/litigations/tricks, nothing attached to him. If he wants to save the 'upapandava's', he can easily save them, but he didn't do that. One has to see the REALITY always. It should be experienced, not be taught/or explained. Knowldege has to be gained in the form of VIDYA.

A dusty particle under the feet of my SriGuruKameswara


Dr. M.Kameswara RaoSenior Scientist, P&T Division,Defence Research & Development Establishment, Ministry of Defence, Govt of IndiaJhansi Road, Gwalior-474002,IndiaPh 91-(0)751-2390368(0) Imp Note:The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments if any.
 

    On Saturday, 6 January 2018 3:45 PM, Raghav Kumar Dwivedula via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
 

 On 06-Jan-2018 12:57 PM, "Jaldhar H. Vyas via Advaita-l" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, kuntimaddi sadananda via Advaita-l wrote:

Bhagavat Geeta is from Mahabharata and Geeta is essentially a manual of
> living beautifully and peacefully to ultimately to arrive at peace that
> passeth understanding. Geeta, in essence, provides the discusses how to
> live peacefully according to sanatana dharma perspective.
>

!!!  Let's not forget Gita took place on the eve of an ugly war in which
lakhs of people including virtually the entire flower of the ruling classes
were killed.  The Gita is many things but peaceful it is not.  And note
Arjuna is perfectly willing to give up his kingdom, wealth etc.  It is
Krishna Bhagavan who dissuades him.


I was wondering why a battle in which the 'entire flower of the ruling
classes perished' ( one researcher says that this loss of kxatriya prowess
badly affected India for millennia, making it vulnerable to foreign
invaders ) , is still regarded as right by Astika-s .

( Btw , nAstikas like Amartya Sen have a stupid take on the Gita and say
that the Gita is a dishonest book and it asks us to act without bothering
about the consequences etc etc....)

But coming to the Astika-s perspective on extolling certain kinds of
violence -
dharmyaddhi yuddhAt shreyonyat kxatriyasya na vidyate, as they say.

Can we say that if Arjuna had run away, then the forces of adharma would
have caused even more deaths and disruption for society, in the longer run?
So even from a societal perspective this killing people and violence was
unavoidable and was for the larger good, like say, fighting the Nazis?

Not to speak of fighting being good at the individual level for Arjuna in
being karma yoga for him, which I am not focusing on for the moment.

(ISKCON teachers say that the battle was legit because Krishna the supreme
personality of Godhead goaded Arjuna. Period.)

Is there any shAstra reference to what constitutes dhArmic killing? Like
meting out just deserts for an AtatAyin, maybe?

Om







The Mahabharata, particularly if you read the original, does not shy away
from acknowledging the neegative consequences of the Pandavas actions.
Nevertheless it was the right thing to do.  What the Gita teaches is how to
develop the mental equanimity to do the right thing even when it may seem
to be wrong.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>

_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org


   


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list