[Advaita-l] Debunking Drishti-Srishti Vada and Eka Jiva Vada - part 1
kumaraditya22 at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 16 02:01:20 EDT 2017
Understood, thanks. Appreciate your views/feedback. I am actually writing an essay and so sent the mail which was in draft. So the whole Ishwara thing is part of the essay and not part of our exchange. Anyway thanks for your feedback.
From: Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>
To: Aditya Kumar <kumaraditya22 at yahoo.com>; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Sunday, 16 July 2017 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Debunking Drishti-Srishti Vada and Eka Jiva Vada - part 1
I cannot further the discussion with anyone who top-posts continuously. It shows that there is no structured discussion inline with points made. Every time a tangential point is brought in ignoring all that was discussed or the same point is repeated in a lengthy post as if it is the original post. Its going nowhere.
In any case, I have presented my perspective as to why your understanding of DSV is incorrect, all the more now with your equating the Ishvara of DSV with Buddhist devas and what not, with absolutely no basis, misunderstanding Ajatavada, Gaudapadacharya's turiya which is nothing but Mandukya mantra's chaturtham, discarding Sw. Prakashananda completely... what use is my explanation or anyone else's then when you have preconcluded!
Finally, when you say that the problem with DSV is that it doesn't add up consistently, revisit SDV approach, thereby thinking of your subjectivity of not understanding DSV and kindly do not present it as an objective conclusion. :) Thank you and best wishes.
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list