[Advaita-l] Advaita and Madhyamika Buddhism
agnimile at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 07:30:53 CDT 2016
Namaste Sri Bhaskar ji,
I can see this developing into a big discussion :), so let us agree to
disagree and call it a day.
On 19 Sep 2016 1:24 p.m., "Bhaskar YR" <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> Hare Krishna
> The meaning of antya pramANa is more profound than that sir. The bhAshya
> of the yaa nishaa sloka goes into it a bit. What it means is that after
> jnAna, the very pramAtritvam of the pramAta is destroyed. Hence there is no
> more pramANa for such a one.
> Ø My doubt is not about the status pramANa after jnana, atra veda aveda
> applicable for the jnAni. What about the pramANa of the shurti as antya
> prior to this jnana when any paurusheya text doing the same work of
> apaurusheya shruti??
> Also I didn't say that any text can do so. I said that any text that is
> based on the veda, taught by a guru.
> Ø That is fine. That means any text in any language which is based
> on veda/vedAnta’s teaching is enough for guru to teach brahma jnana to his
> shishya. Again does it not mean that shruti cannot always be a source text
> for doing the brahma jignAsa??
> Reading a novel that has the hero saying I am Brahman, does not count :)
> Ø Why I am not able to understand!!?? ‘Aham brahmAsmi’ is not one of
> the mahAvAkya-s of vedAnta?? If the hero declaring the Upanishad satya in
> this novel why cannot it be a pramANa for the guru to teach this satya to
> his shishya?? For that matter, as you know, even in the Upanishad itself
> we have allegories like this J
> As I told Chandramouliji, I presented my views. You are welcome to
> Ø Kindly don’t think I am disagreeing with anyone, just thinking aloud
> about the status of shruti as untya pramANa when somany alternative
> paurusheya texts doing the job of shruti. You can ignore this, if it is an
> untraditional way of thinking.
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list