ravikiranm108 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 11 00:35:48 CST 2016
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> Hare Krishna
> doesn't Advaita accept both paramArtha and vyavahArika standpoints ?
> Ø Yes, but the question is, does the vyAvahArika satya has an
> independent existence apart from pAramArthika satya??
Where do you find such references of having independent existence in
Advaitic texts ?
> I don’t think so because pAramArthika satya ‘is_not’ an avasthAteeta
> vyavahAra abhAva satya. In that sense what is our stand point with regard
> to Ishwara?? Just seeing Ishwara in vyavahAra realizing that he is
> ‘mithya’ like jagat ?? Those jnAni-s who have interacted with HIM even
> after jnana like madhusUdana etc. though that Ishwara with whom they have
> interacted is ‘kevala mithyA’!!??
Why is there an effort to mix-up paramArtha and vyavahAra ?
> Is there a contention in below topic, from Advaitic view?
> Ø Do you think that ‘Ishwara’s existence in Advaita out of
The very mix-up is the contention ..
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list