[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??
vranjit49 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 00:29:05 CDT 2016
Even this is my understanding. Clay-pot, gold-ornament is analogy given for cause-effect relation. Since the effect is non different from the cause, the effect should be discarded as they are not permanent. Here the nondual cause is ever permanent and never the effect. Further the cause is nondual but the effects are many. This is the analogy.
From: श्रीमल्ललितालालितः via Advaita-l
Sent: Monday 21 March 2016 10:38 AM
To: Bhaskar YR
Reply To: श्रीमल्ललितालालितः
Cc: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> Mrud-ghata, rajju-sarpa both examples have been given to prove brahma
> niravayavatva and jagat svarUpa.
First of all, mRdghaTa is not for adhyAsa, it is for kArya-kAraNAbheda.
See the prakaraNa of chhAndogya.
rajju-sarpa is not for niravayavatva. It's for saying that every thing
apart from brahman is superimposed. See brahmsUtrAdyAdhikaraNam.
To unsubscribe or change your options:
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list